Add EIP: Withdrawal Credential Update Request #9005
+214
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
c-new
File
|
eth-bot
added
e-consensus
eth-bot
changed the title
|
The commit 25b6116 (as a parent of 9a4e52c) contains errors. |
abcoathup
reviewed
Oct 31, 2024
abcoathup
reviewed
Oct 31, 2024
Deluaney1
suggested changes
Nov 6, 2024
Setland34
approved these changes
Nov 8, 2024
Setland34
approved these changes
Nov 8, 2024
|
@abcoathup I have made the suggested changes and everything is green now. Could we proceed to merge this proposal? |
|
Sounds good i must say let hoop on that
…On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 at 9:11 AM, Lucas Saldanha ***@***.***> wrote:
@abcoathup <https://github.com/abcoathup> I have made the suggested
changes and everything is green now. Could we proceed to merge this
proposal?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9005 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BLYZNM7P7RYZB34JY6BYAULZ74IKPAVCNFSM6AAAAABQ5NRBBSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINRWGYZTGOJVGI>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
You need an editor to review, which I am not. |
|
Sure let’s jump on that
…On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 at 2:48 PM, Andrew B Coathup ***@***.***> wrote:
Could we proceed to merge this proposal?
You need an editor to review, which I am not.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9005 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BLYZNM7YUFKLCSBASJRHZS3Z75P3NAVCNFSM6AAAAABQ5NRBBSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINRWG42DGNRRGM>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Setland34
approved these changes
Nov 10, 2024
Setland34
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2024
Allzz77123
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2024
Allzz77123
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2024
g11tech
reviewed
Nov 13, 2024
|
@g11tech thanks for the comments. Could you take a second look? Cheers! |
Setland34
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2024
11 tasks
g11tech
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
|
|
||
| #### Block processing | ||
|
|
||
| At the end of processing any execution block where `block.timestamp >= FORK_TIMESTAMP` (i.e. after processing all transactions and after performing the block body requests validations) client software **MUST** include a call the contract as `SYSTEM_ADDRESS` and empty input data to trigger the system subroutine execute. The resopnse should be treated as a new request type (0x03) according to [EIP-7685](./eip-7685.md). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| At the end of processing any execution block where `block.timestamp >= FORK_TIMESTAMP` (i.e. after processing all transactions and after performing the block body requests validations) client software **MUST** include a call the contract as `SYSTEM_ADDRESS` and empty input data to trigger the system subroutine execute. The resopnse should be treated as a new request type (0x03) according to [EIP-7685](./eip-7685.md). | |
| At the end of processing any execution block where `block.timestamp >= FORK_TIMESTAMP` (i.e. after processing all transactions and after performing the block body requests validations) client software **MUST** include a call the contract as `SYSTEM_ADDRESS` and empty input data to trigger the system subroutine execute. The response should be treated as a new request type (0x03) according to [EIP-7685](./eip-7685.md). |
g11tech
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
EIPS/eip-7804.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ### Consensus Layer | ||
|
|
||
| Full specification <!-- TODO add link to consensus-spec PR --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the specification here also looks half baked so can you add another <!-- TODO complete the specification --> so we can merge this for draft
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Of course! Done! :)
5 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
EIP-7804: Withdrawal Credential Update Request
Allow validators to update their withdrawal credentials via execution requests
This proposal defines a mechanism to allow validators to update their withdrawal
credentials using a new execution request type (0x03). The request allows for
changing the execution address and the withdrawal credential prefix (0x01 or 0x02).